During the first national meeting of the partners in March 2004 in Goslar a mindmap was presented and commented on the basis of which expectations and wishes of the partners were harmonised with the application and first clarifications were tackled regarding further procedures.

In this context it seemed sensible to all those involved not to realise any developments that would result in a uniform and central collection of data about the target groups (learners), approaches and requirements of the partners being too different.

They chose an approach instead which is based on the idea that inventories are collections (pools) of measuring instruments or items, designed or configured according to the respective demands of the partners, and which is a stimulus for a self-assessment as well as for a mutual evaluation (and motivation).

Here different methods of an inspecting evaluation (evaluation by peering, by observing and dealing with the products, by experts and partners) became necessary.

They also agreed not to do any superior data collections regarding the achievements of the learners (tests) but to give incitements by samples of different measuring instruments in the three elements of blended learning and to allow the exchange of experience.

This lead to the following distinction of three evaluation levels:

• Level 1: process evaluation of networking the projects
• Level 2: evaluation within the projects, designs for qualifying learners
• Level 3: procedures and instruments for evaluation of products and results